LA Times opposes Prop 8, supports gay marriage

PinkNews logo on a pink background surrounded by illustrated line drawings of a rainbow, pride flag, unicorn and more.

The LA Times signalled its support for gay marriage by running an editorial today calling Proposition 8 a “deplorable situation”.

The Supreme Court recently delayed its decision on gay marriage until 2012 to decide whether the backers of Proposition 8 have the right to appeal a lower court decision that it is unconstitutional.

The LA Times said: “Gay and lesbian couples should be allowed to marry while the Proposition 8 case works its way through the system.

“The denial of constitutional rights, even temporarily, is a deplorable situation that must meet high legal standards to be allowed to continue. In our view, those conditions have not been met.”

A three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals asked the Californian Supreme Court if Protect Marriage, the backer of the original ballot, known as Prop 8, can step in to defend the ban as state officials have refused to defend the ban on gay marriage.

The confusion stems from a ruling by Judge Vaughn Walker in August, which ruled that the ban on gay marriage in California was wrong. The decision came after a lengthy “trial” of the arguments for and against allowing gay couples to marry. “The evidence presented at trial and the position of the representatives of the State of California show that an injunction against enforcement of Proposition 8 is in the public’s interest,” Judge Walker wrote at the time. He initially ordered for gay marriages to resume in the state with almost immediate effect.

Unusually, the official ‘defendants’ of that appeal, then governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney-General Jerry Brown, refused to defend the ban. So, the groups who supported the introduction of Prop 8 have been arguing that they have the right to defend the ban on marriage.

The Supreme Court has now asked for written arguments to be submitted between March 14 and May 9 and pledged to hold a hearing in September, at the earliest. A decision would then be made within 90 days.

If the Supreme Court then decides that Protect Marriage have the right to defend the case, then it will return to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. If the Supreme Court rules that the group do not have right to defend the case, it is likely to reinstate gay marriage in California. Either way, a final decision looks unlikely to be reached during 2011.