Kim Davis comes out against Kentucky’s new ‘segregated’ gay marriage law
Could it be that Kim Davis isnāt the biggest homophobe in Kentucky?
The divisive Kentucky clerk was jailed for contempt of court last year after repeatedly blocking same-sex weddings.
A Republican-backed law passed in the state Senate earlier this month which would create separate license forms for gay and straight couples.
The bill would strip the titles ābride/groomā from the licenses for same-sex couples ā banning them from being āgroom and groomā or ābride and brideā, and instead simply stating āfirst partyā and āsecond partyā. Licenses issued for heterosexual couples would maintain their ātraditionalā wording.
However, according to Kentucky Senator Morgan McGarvey, Davis passionately spoke at a clerkās meeting on the issue ā against the segregation.
Senator McGarvey, who submitted an amendment which would have maintained a single form for gay and straight couples, said that he was stunned to hear Davis speaking in favour of his amendment.
He wrote: āI had no idea what to expect when discussing my proposed changes to the marriage license form with the vast majority of Kentuckyās clerks, especially when I noticed Mrs. Davis, the Rowan County Clerk, sitting in the audience.
āSB 5 calls for the creation of two separate marriage license forms: one with spaces for ābrideā and āgroomā and the other with lines designated āfirst partyā and āsecond partyā.
āI proposed reducing the headaches created by two forms by combing them into one form that allows the couple getting married to select whether they wish to be identified as the ābrideā, āgroomā, or āspouseā.
āMy own reasoning is simple. One form is easier to handle, less expensive and puts everyone on equal footing.ā
He added: āAfter passing out sample forms and answering a multitude of questions and hypothetical scenarios, Kentuckyās clerks seemed to agree that one form is how we should proceed.
āThen Mrs Davis stood up to speak. We had never met and I had no idea what to expect.
āTo my pleasure, and admittedly my surprise, Mrs Davis agreed with my amendment and my approach.
āIn front of a room full of her colleagues she emotionally acknowledged her role in causing this debate but whole-heartedly endorsed my amendment.
āAs Mrs Davis told the other clerks, they should support my amendment because using two forms just invites problems.
āI stood in stunned silence at the front of the room as Mrs Davisā remarks seemed to cement the clerksā opinions that we should use one form instead of two.ā
However, even rejection from Kim Davis wasnāt enough to convince hardline Republicans to abandon their plans for āsegregatedā marriage.
Senator McGarvey continued: āUnfortunately that is not where the story ends.
āThe Senate did not feel the same way about my amendment as Mrs. Davis and the rest of Kentuckyās clerks.
āThe [local newspaper] Courierās website headline said, āKim Davis marriage license bill clears Senateā. Ironically, the truth is that both Mrs. Davis and the Fairness Coalition opposed the bill as it finally passed.ā
The bill is now headed to the state House ā but may be subject to a legal challenge if it passes.