Kim Davis comes out against Kentucky’s new ‘segregated’ gay marriage law

PinkNews logo on a pink background surrounded by illustrated line drawings of a rainbow, pride flag, unicorn and more.

Could it be that Kim Davis isnā€™t the biggest homophobe in Kentucky?

The divisive Kentucky clerk was jailed for contempt of court last year after repeatedly blocking same-sex weddings.

A Republican-backed law passed in the state Senate earlier this month which would create separate license forms for gay and straight couples.

The bill would strip the titles ā€œbride/groomā€ from the licenses for same-sex couples ā€“ banning them from being ā€˜groom and groomā€™ or ā€˜bride and brideā€™, and instead simply stating ā€œfirst partyā€ and ā€œsecond partyā€. Licenses issued for heterosexual couples would maintain their ā€˜traditionalā€™ wording.

However, according to Kentucky Senator Morgan McGarvey, Davis passionately spoke at a clerkā€™s meeting on the issue ā€“ against the segregation.

Senator McGarvey, who submitted an amendment which would have maintained a single form for gay and straight couples, said that he was stunned to hear Davis speaking in favour of his amendment.

He wrote: ā€œI had no idea what to expect when discussing my proposed changes to the marriage license form with the vast majority of Kentuckyā€™s clerks, especially when I noticed Mrs. Davis, the Rowan County Clerk, sitting in the audience.

ā€œSB 5 calls for the creation of two separate marriage license forms: one with spaces for ā€˜brideā€™ and ā€˜groomā€™ and the other with lines designated ā€˜first partyā€™ and ā€˜second partyā€™.

ā€œI proposed reducing the headaches created by two forms by combing them into one form that allows the couple getting married to select whether they wish to be identified as the ā€˜brideā€™, ā€˜groomā€™, or ā€˜spouseā€™.

ā€œMy own reasoning is simple. One form is easier to handle, less expensive and puts everyone on equal footing.ā€

He added: ā€œAfter passing out sample forms and answering a multitude of questions and hypothetical scenarios, Kentuckyā€™s clerks seemed to agree that one form is how we should proceed.

ā€œThen Mrs Davis stood up to speak. We had never met and I had no idea what to expect.

ā€œTo my pleasure, and admittedly my surprise, Mrs Davis agreed with my amendment and my approach.

ā€œIn front of a room full of her colleagues she emotionally acknowledged her role in causing this debate but whole-heartedly endorsed my amendment.

ā€œAs Mrs Davis told the other clerks, they should support my amendment because using two forms just invites problems.

ā€œI stood in stunned silence at the front of the room as Mrs Davisā€™ remarks seemed to cement the clerksā€™ opinions that we should use one form instead of two.ā€

However, even rejection from Kim Davis wasnā€™t enough to convince hardline Republicans to abandon their plans for ā€˜segregatedā€™ marriage.
Mike Huckabee Holds Rally in Support of Jailed Clerk Kim Davis in Kentucky
Senator McGarvey continued: ā€œUnfortunately that is not where the story ends.

ā€œThe Senate did not feel the same way about my amendment as Mrs. Davis and the rest of Kentuckyā€™s clerks.

ā€œThe [local newspaper] Courierā€™s website headline said, ā€˜Kim Davis marriage license bill clears Senateā€™. Ironically, the truth is that both Mrs. Davis and the Fairness Coalition opposed the bill as it finally passed.ā€

The bill is now headed to the state House ā€“ but may be subject to a legal challenge if it passes.