Lord Tebbit: It’s perfectly sensible to think gay acts are sinful

Illustrated rainbow pride flag on a pink background.

Former Conservative Party chair Norman Tebbit is upset about gay people again.

Lord Tebbit, a former Thatcher minister and Chairman of the Conservative Party, is a long-running opponent of LGBT rights.

In an interview with The Conversation, the Tory peer insisted it was ā€œperfectly sensibleā€ to think gay acts are sinful.

He said: ā€œ[I think that] to be a homosexual cannot be a sin because that is what God has created, but it is perfectly sensible to argue that a homosexual act is a sin because that is what the Bible has said from the time of the Old Testament through the New Testament.

ā€œSo therefore, as a Christian, should you dump all that and still call yourself a Christian? Itā€™s a bit doubtful.ā€

Lord Tebbit: It’s perfectly sensible to think gay acts are sinful

He added: ā€œI opposed gay marriage because it is fundamentally not what marriage was set out to be.

ā€œI donā€™t like this way of proceeding by simply changing the meaning of a word. Weā€™re doing too much of that.ā€

Lord Tebbit recently claimed materials created for LGBT-inclusive sex and relationship education will ā€œdamageā€ and confuse children.

The peer claimed: ā€œI think it is damaging to children to introduce uncertainty into their minds.ā€

He said that the former PM had ā€œf**ked things upā€ by introducing same-sex marriage, as it would lead to incestuous or polygamous marriage.


The peer claimed: ā€œWeā€™ve got to make these same-sex marriages available to all. It would lift my worries about inheritance tax because maybe Iā€™d be allowed to marry my son. Why not?

ā€œWhy shouldnā€™t a mother marry her daughter? Why shouldnā€™t two elderly sisters living together marry each other? I quite fancy my brother!ā€

The peer has also argued against LGBT equality because he was worried about a gay royal becoming Queen or King.

During the equal marriage debate he warned: ā€œThere is, I believe, no bar to a lesbian succeeding to the throne. It may happen. It probably will, at some stage. What, then, if she marries and her partner bears a child by an anonymous sperm donor? Is that child the heir to the throne?

ā€œIf the Queen herself subsequently bore a child by an anonymous donor, which child then, if either, would inherit the throne?

ā€œThe possibilities must have been discussed.ā€