Australian Government calls Labor ‘villains’ for threat to block public same-sex marriage vote

The Australian Government has called the Labor party ā€œvillainsā€ for threats to block a costly and time-consuming public vote on same-sex marriage.

Labor leader Bill Shorten has called a plebiscite, as proposed by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, the ā€œsecond-best optionā€.

The Labor party and the Greens have criticised the idea of a plebiscite, saying it is costly and time-consuming, and that the matter should be settled with a parliamentary vote.

Bill Shorten Campaigns In Melbourne As Labor Falls Behind In Latest Polls

On Sunday Government frontbencher Christopher Pyne told Sky News: ā€œBill Shorten and the Labor Party are ā€¦ putting at risk the possibility of marriage equality in Australia. They are the villains in the piece.

ā€œMr Shorten cannot guarantee that there will be a vote in the Parliament on marriage equality. So heā€™s quite prepared to say to all those same-sex couples who want to marry ā€¦ heā€™s quite prepared to tell them ā€˜noā€™, weā€™re not going to allow that to happen.

ā€œSo the the only villain in the piece here is Bill Shorten, not the Coalition.ā€

Speaking on Sunday in Melbourne, Shorten said: ā€œWe want to have marriage equality and we want to do it as quickly as possible.

ā€œA vote in the parliament is the quickest, cheapest, least divisive mechanism.ā€

A plebiscite, or public vote, has been criticised as a stalling technique, and for costing taxpayers in Australia estimates of hundreds of millions of dollars.

In addition, the public vote would be non-binding, and would have to be followed by a parliamentary vote in order to make same-sex marriage law.

This is despite a majority of parliamentarians in Australia having indicated that they are pro-same-sex marriage.

But Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has hit back, suggesting that the plebiscite would be the quickest way to legalise same-sex marriage.

He told ABC TV: ā€œThere is no question that the fastest way, the way to guarantee that there is a vote in the parliament on gay marriage in this parliament, is to support the plebiscite.ā€

The Australian Green Party has already indicated that it will oppose the plebiscite but has admitted being unable to block it without Laborā€™s input.

But Turnbull remains adamant that Labor will allow the vote to go ahead, and that arguing against the plebiscite in case the no-vote wins is ā€œthe most anti-democratic argument.ā€

ā€œThe Labor Party must want to delay same-sex marriage for a very long time if they are briefing that,ā€ he added.

Turnbull has broken an election pledge he made to hold a public vote om same-sex marriage by the end of the year, announcing that it will take place in 2017.

The Prime Minister said that he could not just hold a parliamentary vote on equal marriage because ā€œhe is not a dictatorā€ ā€“ so a public vote is being held.

Labour have criticised the move calling it expensive and pointless. The vote is estimated to cost $160 million of taxpayers money, or as much as half a billion dollars, according to estimates by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The liberal party remains divided on equality issues and Turnbull himself has been a vague supporter of equal marriage.

He previously came under fire for removing LGBT content from a sex education campaign.