Proud mum faces having to send trans daughter to $20,000-a-year school just so she can play sports

Lisa Stanton, a mother in Texas, is doing the hair of her daughter Maya

A Texas mum is considering shelling out huge costs for private schools to ensure her trans daughter has a gender-affirming experience in education.

ā€‹ā€‹Lisa Stanton is among a slew of parents who have been viciously fighting against anti-trans legislation in Texas. In January, the state enacted a law that would prohibit transgender girls and women, like Stantonā€™s daughter Maya, from playing on school sports teams that align with their gender identity.

Stanton, who has long fought against the ban, told PinkNews that the day the anti-trans law went into effect was ā€œtoughā€.

ā€œWhatā€™s weird ā€“ surreal ā€“ about it is that no one else in our lives realises whatā€™s happening on that day,ā€ she explained. ā€œEverybody else is going about their normal business, but itā€™s like, ā€˜Oh, my childā€™s officially a second-class citizen as of todayā€™.ā€

Right now, Maya’s day-to-day routine hasn’t been impacted by the ban, as sheā€™s not on a sports team in elementary school. But as she moves through school, that’s likely to change.

As such, Stanton said the family has been forced to ā€œreally thinkā€ about enrolling Maya in a private school.Ā She told PinkNews that private schools are not subjected to ā€‹ā€‹University Interscholastic League regulations (the athletic governing body for public schools in Texas), so private school teams ā€œplay in a different leagueā€.

ā€œDepending on the school, the policies will be different,ā€ Stanton said. ā€œSo we’re investigating and kind of looking into what options there would be if she wanted to play, what schools would be affirming and would it cause an issue for their teams.ā€

But switching schools is an issue that the family is ā€œhaving to grapple withā€ because theyā€™re ā€œstrong believers in public educationā€ ā€“ and it goes without saying that sending Maya to a private school would also be “financially really taxing”.

“To pay $20,000 a year [for school fees] ā€“ that’s just not something that we’re in a position to do,” Stanton said. It’s a catch-22 situation, as naturally, the family doesn’t want Maya to miss out on having a gender-affirming education and being able to participate fully in education and sports.

ā€œMaya is never going to be like a superstar athlete ā€“ not with my genes ā€“ but she enjoys being with friends, doing an activity together and feeling a part of something,ā€ Stanton said.

She added: ā€œWe all know that being active is good not just for your physical health but also your mental health.

ā€œIt gets those endorphins up, and my child is going to be in an environment where she is ā€˜otheredā€™ constantly because she doesnā€™t get to engage in that within the public education system in Texas.ā€

Rights groups across the US are fighting anti-trans sports bans

Texas governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 25 (HB 25), which requires that student-athletes play on sports teams that correspond to the sex listed on their birth certificate received at or near the time of their birth, last October.

Brian Klosterboer, staff attorney for the ACLU of Texas, told PinkNewsĀ that the law is different to those passed in states such as Idaho and West Virginia, and that it remains unclear how it will be enforced.

Klosterboer explained thatĀ the text of the Texas bill requires the University Interscholastic League (UIL) “to create rules and guidance on exactly how it will be enforcedā€.

Klosterboer said the UIL previously ā€œjust went by a student’s birth certificate and the gender listed on that birth certificateā€, which was ā€œalready deeply discriminatory and harmful for transgender youthā€.

Though discriminatory, this was ā€œenforceable just by looking at someone’s birth certificateā€. However, the new law says schools and coaches much ā€œgo based on biological sexā€, which is ā€œnot a term that exists in either state or federal lawā€.

Because the law is ā€œreally unclear on how it can be implemented or enforcedā€, the ACLU of Texas is ā€œactively monitoring what school districts are doingā€ as well as what UIL is doing.

A legal challenge has not been raised, but Klosterboer saidĀ that “no option is off the table”.

ā€œThere are a number of court cases that are dealing with the same issue and that are going to inform what a court would do here in Texas.ā€

Enforcement of similar laws has been halted in Idaho and West Virginia as courts battle over the laws, while in November, several LGBT+ advocates ā€“ including the ACLU, the ACLU of Tennessee and Lambda Legal ā€“ brought a lawsuit challenging a trans sports ban inĀ Tennessee.

Klosterboer said the ACLU is hoping that school districts and UIL will acknowledge that they should follow the federal constitution and Title IX, a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or education programme that receives federal funding.

In June, the US Department of Education said it extended Title IX protections to LGBT+ students on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Shelly Skeen, senior attorney for Lambda Legal, told PinkNews that the firm has worked with the ACLU before to ā€œstop similar discriminatory laws targeting trans youthā€.

Skeen added that HB 25 directly targets ā€œtrans youth and seeks to exclude them from participation in the activities and opportunities available to all studentsā€.

ā€œBy targeting trans youth and separating them from other students on the playing field, HB 25 ostracises them and marginalises them from their peers and in doing so harms their mental, physical and social well being,ā€ Skeen said.

ā€œLaws that target and harm a specific group for no compelling reason are discriminatory and unconstitutional.ā€